|
|

ADL PRAISES OSCE
ASSEMBLY'S CALL FOR ACTION AGAINST ANTI-SEMITISM
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL)
hailed a strong
resolution on combating anti-Semitism adopted by
parliamentarians from the 55 participating states of the
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).
Adopted by the OSCE's 14th Annual Parliamentary
Assembly, which concluded today in
Washington, D.C.,
the resolution urges states to define and collect data on
anti-Semitism and hate crimes and to develop legal and
educational strategies to combat them. It also urges
parliaments to initiate regular discussions and public awareness
efforts on anti-Semitism. The call for action was offered by
Prof. Gert Weisskirchen, a Bundestag Member who was appointed
this year as the first OSCE Personal Representative on
Anti-Semitism. Abraham H.
Foxman, ADL National Director, issued the following statement:
The OSCE Assembly's
call to action is a welcome step in the battle against rising
global anti-Semitism. The OSCE Parliamentary Assembly brought
together parliamentarians from both sides of the aisle and both
sides of the
Atlantic unified in
their conviction that a failure to address anti-Semitism will
have adverse ramifications for all peoples and societies. Yet
we must not lose momentum. The 55 participating states should
follow-up with hearings in their own parliaments to raise
awareness and to craft national action plans against
anti-Semitism and intolerance.
We commend the leadership of
Prof. Weisskirchen who has fought against anti-Semitism with
sensitivity and passion throughout his tenure in the Bundestag.
We are grateful for the commitment of members of Congress who
have worked tirelessly to press OSCE states to address this
problem. OSCE Parliamentary Assembly President and Rep. Alcee
Hastings (D-FL), Congressional Helsinki Commission Chair Sen.
Sam Brownback (R-KS), Sen. George Voinovich (R-OH), and Reps.
Chris Smith (R-NJ) and Ben Cardin (D-MD) have consistently
worked in a bipartisan manner to ensure a distinct focus by the
OSCE on anti-Semitism.
The Parliamentary
Assembly's 2002 resolution on anti-Semitism broke new ground in
acknowledging the link between some anti-Israel animus and
anti-Semitism -- language that was hailed as part of the "Berlin
Declaration" against anti-Semitism in 2004.
The Anti-Defamation League, founded in 1913, is the world's
leading organization fighting anti-Semitism through programs and
services that counteract hatred, prejudice and bigotry.
Special Dispatch
- Turkish Media Project/Antisemitism Documentation Project
MEMRI,
DR. AARON LERNER
Antisemitism in the Turkish Media (Part III): Targeting Turkey's
Jewish
Citizens
The following is the third report in a series on
the issue of antisemitism in the Turkish media.(1) This
phenomena is directed not only against the Jews in general, it
also targets Turkey's Jewish citizens, in the form of multiple
attacks on Turkey's Chief Rabbi; insults to and offensive
characterization of Turkey's Jews; and accusations of
disloyalty, espionage, and treason. The media frequently accuse
Turkish Jews of destroying the Ottoman Empire, carrying out the
'genocide' of Armenians, hatching sinister plots against Turkey,
establishing a secular 'anti-Islamic' regime in Turkey; also
blaming Jews for being rich and influential is often seen.
Publications by the Islamic terrorist organization IBDA-C,(2)
which claimed responsibility for the November 15, 2003 bombings
of two Istanbul synagogues, circulate freely in Turkey; dozens
of pages in each issue are dedicated to virulently antisemitic
literature.(3) Books such as Mein Kampf, The Protocols of the
Elders of Zion, and The International Jew are high on Turkish
bestseller lists, and are displayed prominently in the front of
bookstores.
The following report also focuses on some of the
intellectuals and liberal journalists in Turkey who have spoken
out against this wave of antisemitism.
"Judaism is Synonymous With Treason"
Columnist Fahri Guven wrote in the Islamist daily Milli
Gazete:(4) "[...] The Ottomans saved the Jews from the hands
of Christians, who murdered them along with the Muslims in
Endulus [Muslim Spain]. When Russia and Hungary persecuted the
Jews, again the Ottomans saved them. The Muslim Turks rescued
Jews yet again, from the hands of Hitler, who was himself a
hidden Jew [...]. From the beginning, the Ottomans showed
hospitality, seemingly even by allotting the best homes to the
Jews - along the Bosphorus, in Istanbul's most luxurious area.
"And, characteristic of their savage, treacherous [nature], in
return they [the Jews] first overthrew Sultan Abdulhamid and
destroyed the Ottomans;(5) [then], like insects, they ate away
at the Ottoman [Empire]; and as if this were not enough, they
stabbed the Muslim Turkish soldiers in Palestine in the back.
"'Judaism' is synonymous with 'treason' [...] They [the Jews]
even betrayed God [...] When God told them to bow their heads
while entering Al-Quds [Jerusalem], they entered with their
heads up. The prophets sent to them, such as Zachariah and
Isaiah, were murdered by the Jews [...] In fact, no amount of
pages or lines would be sufficient to explain the Koranic
chapters and our Lord Prophet's [Muhammad's] words that tell us
of the betrayals of the Jews. [...]"
"Here is the Real Jew!"
Columnist for the ultra-nationalist daily Ortadogu Selcuk
Duzgun, in an article titled "Here is the Real Jew,"
wrote:(6) "Salamon [a Jewish name often used in a derogatory
way] is on his deathbed. He asks his wife about each member of
his family and wants to know if they are present. When the wife
assures him that all his loved ones are beside him, he is
angered and shouts at them for leaving the shop unattended.
"This is a clear example of what the real Jew is. While we read
and laugh at our jokes about the Jews, they [the Jews] are
enjoying themselves by fooling the entire world. "[...] Oh my
naive people - you have elevated so many of these [Jews], and
you have given an identity to so many [who had none]. You have
saved, protected, and fed so many of them!... [...] and they
have created the [country's] agenda and continued their march to
[their] 'Promised Land.' While we were calling them Masons,
Sabbateans, Rotarians, etc., they had the privilege of ruling
our country. Whatever name we call them, we always are faced
with the truth that they are the 'JEWS.' "[...] We are
surrounded. Wherever we look we see traitors. Wherever we turn
we see impure, false converts. Whichever stone you turn over,
there is a 'JEW' under it. And we keep thinking to ourselves:
'Hitler did not do enough to these Jews.'[...]"
Turkey's Chief Rabbi Attacked, Reviled By Media
On August 17, 2004, the Islamist daily Anadolu'da Vakit,
popularly known as Vakit, published a column by Abdurrahim
Karakoc that lauded Hitler for his "foresight" and for "purging
the bloodthirsty, swindling Jews" and also praised Osama bin
Laden.(7) In February 2005, the publication of the daily in
Germany was banned by the German government because of its
antisemitic incitement and Holocaust denial. The Turkish press
reacted with attacks on and smears against the German
government, particularly German Interior Minister Otto Schily.
On March 2, 2005, German Ambassador to Ankara, Wolf Ruthart
Born, sent a letter to Turkish Press Council President Oktay
Eksi, of the centrist, widely circulated daily Hurriyet,
who had called Germany's ban on Vakit "the murder of the law."
In it, Ambassador Born said that Vakit's articles were 'inciting
and disgusting' and that it would be better for the Turkish
Press Council to focus on these inappropriate publications
instead of giving legal advice to the German Interior Minister.
Since then, the German government has approached Turkish
Interior Minister Aksu to protest against Vakit's ongoing
attacks on Germany and its government.
At a May 18, 2005 press conference, German Interior Minister
Schily said: "As you know, Anadolu'da Vakit was banned because
of its virulent antisemitism. Then it began publishing articles
attacking me and, lately, Prime Minister Schroeder. The Turkish
government must also concern itself with the Vakit newspaper.
[...] This paper has depicted me, and also our Prime Minister,
as neo-Nazis [...] If the Turkish government does not have the
necessary laws, they should create them."(8) Following the
August 17, 2004 publication of Karakoc's article in Vakit, the
Turkish Chief Rabbinate sent a letter of complaint to several
liberal columnists in Turkish newspapers, prompting a campaign
of daily attacks and revilement against Turkish Chief Rabbi Izak
Haleva by journalists and politicians who write primarily for
Vakit. The following are only a few sample excerpts from this
campaign: The Chief Rabbi must condemn Israel. On August 26,
2004, the headline of Vakit's lead story read: "The Chief Rabbi
who criticizes '[free] thought' is indifferent to Sharon's
cruelty. Turkey's Chief Rabbi, who criticized our writer
Abdurrahim Karakoc in a letter he sent to some columnists, has
never said anything about Israel's massacres that have turned
into 'genocide.'"
On August 27, Vakit's headline, and a report by Kenan Kiran in
the paper, read: "Still not a sound from the rabbi. Chief Rabbi
Haleva, who sent a letter to journalists targeting our writer
Karakoc, has not answered our questions for yet another day.
"The Chief Rabbi's letter prompted many reactions [...]: "AKP MP
from Manisa, Huseyin Tanriverdi, said: '[...] [The Chief
Rabbi's] attitude that is disrespectful of free conscience is
wrong. [...] Those who call themselves 'men,' and especially the
faithful, cannot be silent about the savagery in Palestine. Mr.
Haleva must condemn Israel's inhuman massacres. "MP Tanriverdi
added: 'In the face of the existing barbarism and massacres, Mr.
Karakoc has sought to stop this human tragedy by reminding [us]
of historical facts. [...] Mr. Karakoc has made very reasonable
observations.' "Chief Rabbi Haleva stated that he would send a
written reply to [Vakit's] questions. Although two days have
passed, the following questions remain unanswered: 'Do you
consider Hitler cruel? Do you also consider Sharon cruel,
knowing the world media's decision that the massacres he commits
are similar to what Hitler did to the Jews? Do you condone the
Israeli soldiers' aggression against Palestinian civilians?'"
Rabbi Haleva, if you do not stop Sharon, anti-Jewish
voices may turn into anti-Jewish actions! On August 29, Vakit's
Ilhan Toprak reported: "Turkish Health Workers Union President
Mustafa Basoglu criticized Turkey's Chief Rabbi [in a letter he
sent to him] for being disturbed at Karakoc's comparing Hitler
and Sharon. [...] [The letter read:] 'As a religious leader,
Izak Haleva must make all the necessary efforts to prevent
Sharon's negative attitudes [...] If Sharon [...] is not
stopped, the voices being raised against the Jews [...] might
turn into actions. To prevent that, the Chief Rabbi must stop
Sharon [...]'
More Turkish politicians join in: Chief Rabbi must apologize.
On August 28, the front page of Vakit read: "[...] Politicians
are reacting to Chief Rabbi Haleva: AKP MP from Kahramanmaras
and former President of Turkish Writers Association Atilla Maras
said it was a crime for Turkey's Chief Rabbi to send letters of
complaint to journalists against Abdurrahim Karakoc. MP Maras
added: 'Turkey's Chief Rabbi Izak Haleva must condemn Israel and
Sharon' [...] "Nurettin Aktas, AKP Member of Parliament from
Gaziantep, said that Turkey's Chief Rabbi had no reason to be
disturbed by Karakoc's article, 'Israel is perpetrating state
terrorism [...] The Chief Rabbi [...] must warn Sharon and
apologize to the Palestinian people. The world condemns Sharon,
just like they condemned Hitler.'" "Chief Rabbi, the Commander".
On August 29, in an article titled "Chief Rabbi, the Commander,"
Vakit columnist Huseyin Uzmez joined in: "[...] Why is it that
one of the [Turkish] authorities does not come forward and say:
'You, [Chief Rabbi,] come here! Haven't you learned when and how
to submit a complaint? How dare you cross your limits?'" [...]
Chief Rabbi "Beats the Drums!" On August 31, Hasan
Karakaya added another article to the attack on Turkey's Chief
Rabbi: "[...] It was clear that...the mallet beating these drums
[the six journalists to whom Rabbi Haleva wrote] was in the
hands of that [person], whatever his name is: Helava [derived
from the Turkish word for 'sewage' or 'toilet'] or 'Haleva.'"
Turkish columnist: "Chief Rabbi's synagogues are Zionist
bases" On September 2, 2004, Vakit columnist Nurettin Sirin
wrote: "[...] Firstly, the Chief Rabbi who uses his synagogues
as Zionist bases must learn that no Jew has the right to teach a
lesson on 'human rights' to [us], the children of the Ottomans.
These [Jews], who fled Spain's massacres and found shelter
thanks to Ottoman tolerance, have carried out nothing but
treason and plots on Ottoman territory, and have [always]
carried out the ugly designs of Zionism on this [Turkish] land.
"These people [the Jews] [...] tried to 'Israelize' the Ottoman
[Empire] from within, carrying out their treachery through some
Zionist organizations. With the help of Masonic lodges, Lions
and Rotary clubs, and political, academic, economic, media, and
bureaucratic co-conspirators, they have woven a 'web of
Semitism' on this Islamic geography.
"'Semitism' in this country [Turkey] is the name of 'treason'
against Islam and Muslims, and against all our national and
moral values. [...] Documenting this treachery is as easy as
proving the laws of gravity. In face of this truth, the Chief
Rabbinate and their allies' cries of 'antisemitism' and their
fake claim to innocence are laughable. "[...] Has he [the Chief
Rabbi] ever condemned the genocide by the Jews, that he [dares]
to talk of the so-called persecutions of the Jews? [...] "[...]
It is these so-called innocent Jews who are responsible for the
loss of our Ottoman [Empire], for the trampling of our sanctity,
for the hanging of our forefathers, for the humiliation of all
our beliefs, and for the ban on our women's covering [as
demanded by Islam]. "[...] [Karakoc's] article will be an
important contribution to the questioning of [the Jews']
sinister plots, satanic steps, and historic treason in our
country. When the masks of these so-called innocent people and
groups fall, we will clearly see the monster behind them. "[...]
At this opportunity, I would like to also place my signature
under
the article titled 'Foresight, Israel Shameless' written by my
brother and friend Karakoc, and to express my willingness to be
judged [as I stand] right next to him. God bless your pen and
your heart, brother Karakoc... [...]" For more examples of the
attacks on and revilement of Turkish Chief Rabbi Izak Haleva see
Appendix I.
Turkish Columnist Warns: Last Chance for the Jews.
Columnist for the mainstream secular liberal daily Aksam,
Sakir Suter, wrote:(9) "In Turkey, there are 'sworn enemies' of
the Jews. [But] Jews also have some friends, even if they are
not 'sworn [friends]' [...] Quite a few people [in Turkey] are
pleased by their friendship with Turkish citizens of Jewish
descent. There are some common [shared] historical sorrows and
joys."Today, however, we are on the verge of saying 'there WERE'
[in the past]. We will either cross-out this friendship or
continue with a 'bad taste.' "In Turkey, there is a big 'maybe'
hanging in the minds of [even] those who [until now] did not see
the Jews as 'enemies.' "They [the Turkish Jews] have an
obligation to show us that they are distanced from the terror
that resulted in the death of thousands in Turkey [due to
terrorism activity by the PKK, a separatist Kurdish
organization]... and that the Jews are not 'plotting' against us
[the Turks] together with the [Kurdish] elements in Northern
Iraq, who definitely cannot be our friends. "[...] The burden of
proof is on [...] Tel Aviv to show that they [the Jews] are not
playing out any Israeli 'anti-Turkish plots in Northern Iraq,'
as
reported even by the foreign media. Instead of providing the
required proof, making nasty threat-like comments against Turkey
is ugly. "[...] If they [the Jews] claim to be real friends of
Turkey, the burden is not on the Turks, who have proven their
friendship, but on the Jews, whose 'hostility' we are
discussing. "We, on our part, are offering one last chance
before officially and openly declaring that the Jews are our
'enemy.' "[...][Now] we have reached such a juncture that...
millions in Turkey are all too eager to pour out to the streets
and cry out: 'Death to Zionism!'... 'You [Jew]! Let us hear you
[reply]!' 'You must either prove your innocence ... or apologize
[immediately] to the Turks, who took you for a 'friend' for over
500 years!"
Jewish Espionage. Columnist Suat Gun wrote in the
nationalist daily Once Vatan:(10) "Upon the discovery of an
Israeli mole in the Pentagon, I remembered the book by the late
General Cevat Rifat Atilhan, titled Suzi Liberman, the Jewish
Spy... "Cevat Rifat Atilhan was an officer, much valued by great
Ataturk. His units fought in important [...] battles [during
WWI]. When the Arab-Israel war started in 1948, he joined that
front with the 300 volunteers he gathered, and was successful in
capturing a Jewish settlement from the enemy. "Cevat Rifat
Atilhan is an unequalled patriot, who informed the Turkish
public of the 'Jewish threat.'[...] "This present day espionage
[in the U.S.] is an operation undertaken by the Jews [...]
who like a cancer virus have spread everywhere, destroying the
American governmental system. In reality, the U.S. has been
infected with a 'Jewish cancer,' and the Jews will bring about
its death, demise, or destruction [whichever term you
choose]...."
"Politics are Committing Adultery With Our Honor". Liberal
columnist Ayse Onal, formerly of the secular, Kemalist daily
Aksam and who writes now for the Star Gazete, wrote
an article protesting the Turkish media's accusation of the Jews
for every disaster in the world. She opens with quotes by
antisemitic writers:(11) "335 children and teachers were
murdered in Beslan by the Jews. The barbarism of 9/11 was a
Jewish plot. Turkish society and family values are being
destroyed by the Jews. It is the Jews who are cutting off
heads in Iraq. They [the Jews] are so blinded [with hatred]
that in order to conceal the Jewish finger [role] in all of
that, they sometimes butcher [their fellow] Jews as well. It was
them [the Jews] who bombed their own synagogues. And when their
own families died, they shed false tears.
"The Jews are like a punching bag. Hit [them] and hit [them],
as much as you can... Punch [them] as much as you want, with no
fear, shame, respect or sense of boundaries... In any event,
only about 15,000 Jews remain [in Turkey], and they have no
voice to be heard. "The Jews are a convenient, living shield for
all immorality, all murders, savagery, and lies... If you place
a Jew where there is barbarism or fraud, you have solved the
problem..."And knowing too well what would await them,
nobody has the possibility, nor the courage, to ask, 'Where are
the human rights and freedoms, values of equality, principles of
non-discrimination with regard to religion, race, and
ethnicity?' If the honor [of the citizens] is indeed under the
protection of the [Turkish] constitution, this means that
according to the State, Jews are either not human, or not
citizens.[...]
A Nauseating Synagogue in the Land of the Prophets. In
the Islamist daily Milli Gazete, Burhan Bozgeyik wrote:(12)
"[...] We went to the city of Sanliurfa to visit friends and
relatives. Before entering the city, we went directly to the
garden of the revered Hajji Halil's father. We performed our
noon prayers there. Our young brothers went all out to show us
hospitality. We were in the place where [...] Ibrahim
Aleyhisselam [Abraham] lived. [...] "After food and
conversation, we started thinking about our next stop, Adana.
But, since we had come this far, we had to first visit the cave
where Halilullah [Abraham] was born [...] So we went to the
Dergah Mosque, and there we performed our mid-afternoon prayers.
"I have told you all this as an introduction to our real
subject: On the way back, our guide said, 'Just take a look
here, look at this synagogue.' We looked: it was an impressive
building. "This entire area was expropriated; this park is going
to be expanded so that the synagogue will be prominent,' he
said.(13) "When we saw the synagogue, we lost all our joy. It
wiped away the vision of the beautiful garden, the magnificent
banquet, the mosque, the shrine [...] Instead, this frightful
building stood in front of our eyes like a ghost. What was a
synagogue doing in this 'Land of the Prophets?' [...] Where did
this 'Jew-love' come from?"[...] Frankly, we were extremely
nauseated when we saw the synagogue. The food we had eaten stuck
in our throats like a knot [...]"
Respect for Christians and Jews Harms This Country. In
another article, Burhan Bozgeyik wrote:(14) "Some people in this
country are mistaken in how they treat Christians and Jews. Such
mistakes are harming not only the perpetrators, but also all the
young Muslims of this land, and directly or indirectly, this
country."Heading the list of these mistakes is the respect and
reverence shown to Christians and Jews [...] It is a mistake to
include them in the protocol of meetings, to let them speak, to
applaud them, to quote their words in the newspapers [...]. It
is not just wrong, it is a frighteningly grave mistake [...] "It
is a mistake for so-called professors, writers, thinkers, and
famous intellectuals to make 'sympathetic' statements about
Christians and Jews. Particularly, to say that 'they too will go
to heaven' is an even bigger mistake. [...] Christians and Jews,
who have rejected our Prophet and refuse to recite 'Mohammed is
the Messenger of God' belong forever in Hell. "In the eyes of
God, there is only one religion, and that is Islam [...] There
is only one book, and that is the Koran. [...] "For so-called
'dignitaries' to present Christianity and Judaism as 'godly
religions' is terribly wrong. [...]
THE ISLAMOFASCIST TERROR: Politico Friends
of the Florida Professor of Jihad
Photo:
Arian-al Sami, handcuffed.
While American campuses are crawling with
pro-terror professors, none is as deeply involved in actual perpetration of
terrorism as "Professor" Sami al-Arian. Now it turns out that the Professor of
Jihad had been awfully cozy with certain politicians in very high places.
Claiming to be a Palestinian born in Kuwait, al-Arian had been a tenured
professor of engineering at the University of South Florida when he came to
the attention of the FBI for his role in the Islamic Jihad terrorist
organization, responsible for many mass murders and suicide bombings of
Israeli civilians. The Federal Bureau of Investigation began investigating
Al-Arian's connections to Islamofascist terror groups in the early 1990s,
including via wiretaps. It gathered information on Al-Arian and two other
professors from USF. In some of the intercepted conversations, Al-Arian
allegedly praised suicide bombings, kidnappings and drive-by shootings. .I
call upon you to try to extend true support to the jihad effort in Palestine
so that operations such as these can continue,. he wrote in one fund-raising
appeal after a suicide bombing that killed 22 Israelis in 1995. Al-Arian
appeared on The O'Reilly Factor on September 26, shortly after the September
11th attacks. Bill O'Reilly reported charges from fifteen years earlier that
alleged Al-Arian had used a university-affiliated Islamic "think tank" that he
headed as a front for Palestinian terrorist organizations.


Though well known as a
terrorist since 1996, one month before 9/11 President George W. Bush thanked
Sami Al-Arian's family for a book they sent him and expressed "regret" about
how their son was treated by the Secret Service.
Bush Administration officials repeatedly met with terrorists linked to 9/11
such as Sami al-Arian and Abdurahman al-Amoudi even after the attack
On February 20, 2003, the FBI arrested
Al-Arian after indicting him and seven others on 50 terrorism-related charges.
The University of South Florida finally got around to sacking al-Arian after
he was indicted for terrorism, a fine example of doing too little too late.
Several politicians who had been involved in the coddling of al-Arian have
paid a political price for their stupidity. Attorney General Ashcroft alleged
at a press conference that Al-Arian was the North American head of the
Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ). Al-Arian also co-founded the Islamic
Association for Palestine, which funnels funds to terror organizations.
Naturally - this all made him the hero du jour of the academic Moonbatocracy,
which complains that academic freedom includes the right to organize and fund
genocidal terrorism. The NY Times decided to honor the 9-11 victims of New
York by showing its support for the Florida professor of terrorism. Al-Arian's
trial is slated to begin in Tampa, Florida, in early June. It seems that
al-Arian had some contacts with some friends in some very high offices.
Newsweek just reported that al-Arian's lawyer, William Moffit, will introduce
evidence that his client attended numerous meetings at the White House and met
with high-level figures in both political parties, including Hillary Clinton
and White House political director Karl Rove. Moffit states that Al-Arian
attended meetings at the White House with both Clinton and Bush every year
between 1998 and 2001, attended a briefing at the Justice Department in July
2001, met with Al Gore in November 1998 and Hillary Clinton in October 1999.
Al-Arian did in fact have his photograph taken with President Bush when he was
campaigning in Florida in March 2000 and later was among 150 Muslim-American
activists invited to the White House to attend an .outreach. briefing that was
given by Rove. Perhaps the White House might learn a lesson from all this
about the payoff from pretending that Islamist fascists are moderate and
pro-West.
|
|
PROFESSOR SUSPENDED AFTER DEFENDING ISRAEL
Roger L.
Simon tipped me to the outrageous story of DePaul University Professor
Thomas Klocek, who has been suspended after a verbal altercation with
Muslim student groups. The Chicago Jewish News has an account of the
confrontation; if this is accurate, professor Klocek is apparently
guilty of nothing more than expressing pro-Israel views in the face of
extremist Palestinian propaganda, including the ever-present canards
about Rachel Corrie: What happened, then, on the afternoon of Sept. 15
has been pieced together from accounts by Klocek, his attorney, John
W. Mauck of the law firm Mauck & Baker, accounts from the school and
from the DePaulia, the student newspaper, as well as from an e-mail
account by Salma Nassar, president of the DePaul group Students for
Justice in Palestine and one of the students who was involved in the
incident. (Nassar did not respond to requests for an interview from
Chicago Jewish News).
Here’s what all the parties agree on:
The trouble began when Klocek stopped at a booth run by Students for
Justice in Palestine and one next to it from UMMA (United Muslims
Moving Ahead.) He picked up some literature from the SJP table and
read a sheet depicting the death of Rachel Corrie, the American
activist who was killed by an Israeli bulldozer when she tried to stop
a house demolition in the West Bank town of Rafah. The handout
described Corrie as being “murdered by Israeli bulldozer” and went on
to state that she “was deliberately ran (sic) over, twice, after a
two-hour confrontation between the non-violent international activists
and the Israeli armed forces.” Klocek said he turned to the student
staffing the SJP booth and said, “You know, there’s more than one
perspective on the Middle East conflict. You’re only presenting one
side here.” Students at the booth “began to engage me in
conversation,” he said. Klocek expressed his belief that “strictly
speaking, right now there is no such place as Palestine on the map.
The Palestinian people were simply Arabs who lived in the West Bank
and Gaza.” One of the women at the table told him that she was a
Palestinian, then, according to Klocek, “she got up from the table and
said, you know, the Palestinians are being treated by Israelis the
same way Hitler treated the Jews.” “I took umbrage,” Klocek said. “I
told her that was an absolutely scurrilous statement, an absolute lie.
I said that I believe the Israeli armed forces have exercised very
careful restraint in their responses to what has been almost daily
suicide bombings. There is a big difference between (Israelis)
targeting a terrorist and someone strapped with bombs going in to a
cafe or a seder and blowing up people.” Then, Klocek said, “the UMMA
people began to come over. It was eight against one. A very spirited
conversation” ensued.
Students for
Justice in Palestine involves racism
Klocek said
that when he felt the discussion was generating more heat than light
on both sides, he decided that neither side was going to convince the
other and started to leave. When a student asked if he had any
connection with the university, he told her who he was and what
courses he taught. As he walked away, Klocek said, “students began
coming after me, and I thumbed my chin at them. It’s an Italian New
Jersey expression meaning, ‘I’m finished,’ ‘I’m out of here.”.
“Students for Justice in Palestine,” of course, has a wildly different
story; and as usual, it involves “racism:” Nassar, the SJP president,
described the event in an Oct. 4 e-mail she sent to a number of campus
organizations as “a racist encounter.” She wrote that when students
“responded to (Klocek) in a polite and professional manner ... he
continued to make derogatory and racist comments,” including making
comments about how all terror attacks have been committed by Muslims.
(Klocek said that he was quoting Chicago Sun-Times columnist Neil
Steinberg, who in turn was quoting Abdel Rahman Al-Rashed, the manager
of an Arab news channel, who stated that “It is a certain fact that
not all Muslims are terrorists, but it is equally certain, and
exceptionally painful, that almost all terrorists are Muslims.”)
Nassar went on to state that “we tried engaging Professor Klocek in
conversation but he kept interrupting us and did not allow us to
answer any of his questions.” In addition, she wrote, “he continuously
referred to Palestinians as ‘those people’ and went on to say that
Palestinians “do not exist.” She wrote that when Klocek was leaving,
he “made an obscene hand gesture (he flipped us off.)” Nassar wrote
that she and other students from SJP and UMMA immediately reported the
incident to the dean of students and the dean of the School of New
Learning, as well as to the advisors of their groups.
“Professor
Klocek disrespected the student/professor relationship,” she wrote.
“It was completely inappropriate for him to approach students in an
aggressive manner, his racist and ignorant comments about Muslims and
Palestinians, and the profanity he used completely crossed the line.”
(Klocek admits that he “raised his voice” but denies using profanity.)
In an interview she gave to the DePaulia, the student newspaper,
Nassar added that Klocek “was very aggressive and angry and would go
from one topic to another. Every time we tried to address a topic he’d
get angry and switch.” She reiterated in the interview that his
comments were “inappropriate and offensive.” And that was all it took
for Dean Dumbleton to cave in: Nine days after the incident, Klocek
was called to the office of Susanne Dumbleton, dean of the School for
New Learning. Dumbleton told him that she had received two letters,
one each from SJP and UMMA, and that “there were very serious charges
against me from the students,” according to Klocek, who never saw the
letters. He said Dumbleton told him that she had met with the students
and their faculty advisors from the two groups, and that they were
“hurt and crushed” by Klocek’s remarks.
“They said you used your title as a professor and your power over them
to force them to accept your remarks as true. The dean said she agreed
with them,” Klocek related. (Dumbleton did not respond to repeated
requests for an interview with Chicago Jewish News.) She then told
Klocek he was suspended, with pay, for the remainder of the autumn
quarter. She also advised him to stay off campus, which he did, and
suggested that he not talk to the student newspaper, the DePaulia,
Klocek said. (The school denies that the latter suggestion was ever
made.) Kelsey Snell, the News Editor of The Depaulia in an article
titled “Loop professor takes heat for conduct”, reported that A DePaul
professor has been suspended from his position for the remainder of
this quarter and the upcoming winter quarter after an altercation
between two student organizations and the professor at the Sept. 15
Loop Campus Involvement Fair. Professor Thomas E. Klocek, a part-time
professor in the
School of New Learning,
was suspended after a public display was created around inappropriate
and offensive comments he made to the student organizations Students
for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and United Muslims Moving Ahead (UMMA).
Professor Klocek was contacted Thursday afternoon but failed to
respond for comment before The DePaulia print deadline. At
approximately 1:30 p.m. on September 15, Klocek approached the
informational tables of SJP and UMMA. Klocek allegedly paced in front
of the two tables several times before approaching UMMA and signing
the e-mail contact list displayed. He then returned to standing at a
distance before approaching the tables.
DePaul
University Professor: “Christians have more of a right to Palestine
than Muslims or Jews.”
“He began to engage the people behind
the UMMA booth in conversation,” said Salma Nassar, a senior
accounting student and president of SJP. “He began by saying he was a
professor at DePaul and was speaking about how he had gone to a
Catholic university in Jerusalem. He then continued to talk about how
Christians have more of a right to Palestine than Muslims or Jews.”
The initially calm incident escalated as Klocek asserted that he was
well-read on the subject of Palestine and began to quote an article he
claimed to have read the previous day in the Chicago Tribune. “He
quoted the passage as saying ‘not all Muslims are terrorists but all
terrorists are Muslims,’” said Nassar.
The
students attempted to engage Klocek in discussion regarding his
statement but were abruptly cut off with further examples from Klocek
of terrorist acts by Muslim people. When Nassar began to give examples
of terrorist acts that were not perpetrated by Muslim people, Klocek
changed the subject before she was able to complete her comments.
“He was very aggressive and angry
and would go from one topic to another. Every time we tried to address
a topic he’d get angry and switch,” stated Nassar. Klocek continued by
making statements such as, “there is no such thing as a moderate
Muslim, you are all fanatics,” and making derogatory comments
regarding the validity of the Palestinian nation. “He kept referring
to Palestinians as ‘those people.’ He would point at the word [printed
on the table]. He wouldn’t say the word Palestine or Palestinians. I
asked him what he meant and he said that it’s a made-up word that only
came into the modern media in the last 20 years,” said Nassar. When
Nassar explained that she herself was Palestinian, as were her parents
and grandparents who had lived in the country more than 20 years ago,
Klocek responded by telling Nassar that her statement was
questionable. Klocek continued by making comparisons between
Palestinians and Native Americans and insinuating that neither had a
modern right to their ancestral homes.
The
students began asking Klocek to leave so that they could proceed with
the remainder of the Involvement Fair. When he continued to be
aggressive with the two organizations ,other students observing the
altercation proceeded to report the events to officials at Student
Life.
Amalia Lopez of Student Life was the
first representative to respond. She asked Klocek to leave his
business card in order to continue the conversation in a more
appropriate forum. Several students who observed the incident reported
that Klocek responded by refusing to share his business cards with the
organizations and saying “they can think whatever they want, they can
all yes’m themselves to death.”. “Shortly thereafter, the professor
returned with our leaflets in his hand and threw the leaflets and
information back on our table and walked away,” said SJP member Ben
Meyer. As he walked away Klocek turned to the students and made an
obscene hand gesture. “Student Life took immediate action and was
there for us,” said Ahmad Zahdan, a senior finance and marketing
student and UMMA executive board member. “They did a really great job
and they gave us all the means of getting in touch everyone we needed
to contact,” added Nassar. A group of approximately 12 university
faculty and staff members, not including Klocek, met with the students
on Thursday, Sept. 23 to discuss the incident. Suzanne Dumbleton, Dean
of the School of New Learning, apologized to the students on behalf of
the faulty and staff. At the meeting a discourse began regarding
further steps being taken towards resolving the issue. Administrators
discussed the situation with Klocek and determined that it was an
isolated incident and not typical behavior for the professor,
Dumbleton said. She further explained that Klocek has had “an
otherwise positive career of 15 years,” and explained that he is a
very well read, intelligent instructor who made an error in judgment.
There had been no previous student complaints regarding Klocek’s
conduct and he had a positive relationship with the university. Dumbleton
also emphasized the School of New Learning’s dedication to the core
values of DePaul and that she was deeply saddened by the situation and
the loss of intellectual empowerment the students suffered. “We do not
respect the unfair use of faculty power over students,” she said. As
a result, the university made the decision to suspend Klocek’s
teaching responsibilities through winter quarter of this year. “We do
not support or condone his actions … however, unless the offense is
incredibly egregious or a security threat, we believe a person should
be educated and made to understand the way they have affected others,”
said James Doyle, vice president of Student Affairs.
Kelsey: “Professor
Thomas E. Klocek, a part-time professor in the School of New Learning,
was suspended after a public display was created around inappropriate
and offensive comments he made to student organization.”.
The School of New Learning
plans to work directly with Klocek regarding the situation in order to
address any extenuating circumstances that may have led to his
outburst at the fair. “The person [Klocek] needs to be challenged and
must be accountable,” said Doyle. In addition to the suspension, Fr.
Dennis Holtschneider sent a letter to all faculty, staff and students
on Wednesday to address the situation. The letter addressed two
completely separate incidents that each constituted a breach of the
university value system. The details of the second, unrelated
incident, are unclear at this time. Despite these efforts, both the
students involved in the organization and their advisors feel that the
university has not effectively dealt with the gravity of the
situation. “I appreciated the prompt reaction of the university
especially James Doyle and Suzanne Dumbleton. But in the ensuing
conversation I was a little bit disappointed by the dean of SNL when
it [the conversation] was being shifted towards a defense or excuse of
the professor’s behavior. It was not conveyed that this event was an
abhorrence, but rather she started to ask the students to legitimize
their reaction,” said Khaled Keshk, a professor of religious studies
and UMMA advisor. His sentiments were shared by several concerned
students who were involved in the situation. “I feel like they didn’t
really grasp the gravity of the situation,” said Assia Boundaoui, a
sophomore political science student and member of SJP. From the things
the dean was saying, it seemed like the person that came up to us was
a different professor from the one who teaches and that it was a
completely different persona. From what we got it seemed like
everything he was saying was rooted in his ideology and this wasn’t
coming from nowhere.” “I was completely crushed by the incident
because they spend so much time on Vincentian vaules and the mission
statement but one of their own professors, someone who could have been
my professor, was saying all these things. Not only did he denounce my
religion and claim that we were all terrorists he basically said that
my ethnicity doesn’t exist, which means that all of my roots don’t
exist,” added Nassar. “I would expect this maybe from someone off the
street … then I could just blame it on ignorance but he is a professor
who is pursuing his Ph.D.” Zahdan also expressed concerns that while
the university may assume Klocek's actions were isolated, unreported
incidents may have occured in the past. “This man has been teaching
for 15 years—how long has this been going on? Finally now it happened
in front of the DePaul community and they’ve taken some action. What
if he gets re-instated in January? What is the guarantee that he won’t
bring these ideas and do this to students again,” said Zahdan.
Doyle further defended the university’s actions by saying, “When you
are the victim of a situation like this, you don’t want them [the
person responsible] in your community, but I don’t want to make that
someone else’s problem.” He also added that actions are being taken to
ensure that Klocek is aware of the gravity of the effect he had on the
students. The university plans to take steps to help UMMA and SJP
spread awareness and education on Arab and Muslim issues on campus.
“We will be getting back together to discuss the troubling climate,”
said Doyle. He also explained that he and other university
representatives efforts to support the two organizations in their
plans to educate the DePaul population. At this point, the students of
SJP and UMMA are planning a benefit concert for Palestine, several
guest speakers and other educational work shops. “We hope to promote
cultural awareness and let people know that Palestinians and Muslims
are people with a strong culture and contributions to society. It is
important to have events to demonstrate this to the community,” said
Nassar.
|
|